Bata, a globally recognised shoe brand founded in 1894 in Zlín, Czechoslovakia, by Thomas Bata, has a complex history tied to its operations in the Middle East. With a legacy spanning over a century, the company’s activities in Israel and Palestine have come under scrutiny, particularly in light of recent boycotts linked to the ongoing Israel-Palestine conflict. This investigation seeks to clarify Bata’s historical and current operations in the region and the impact of these boycotts on its sales.

The claim in question suggests that Bata has been operating in territories now under Israeli control since before Israel’s establishment and that these operations have led to the company facing boycotts, particularly due to its continued presence in the West Bank city of Nablus.

Bata’s Historical Presence in Palestine and Israel

Bata’s journey in the Middle East began in the late 1920s. The company’s first significant footprint in the region was in 1927 when it opened a store in present-day Israel. By 1931, Bata had established Palestine Bata Shoe Company Ltd. in Haifa, focusing on the storage and sale of its products. The following year, the company expanded rapidly, opening 12 stores across eight cities, including Jerusalem, Tel Aviv, Haifa, and Jaffa.

The 1930s saw continued growth for Bata in Palestine, with increasing exports to the region. By 1932, Bata had opened additional stores in Nablus, Ramallah, and Tulkarm, serving customers up until 1939. Despite this early success, evidence suggests that no Bata stores are currently operating in Israel, although the company still maintains a presence in Nablus, West Bank.

To verify the claim of Bata’s continued presence in the West Bank, a call was placed to the Bata store listed on Google Maps in Nablus. The store, located on Tunis Street, confirmed that it was indeed operational. This store represents the last known Bata outlet in the region, with no evidence of current operations in Israel.

The Impact of Boycotts on Bata’s Sales

Bata’s operations in Israel and Palestine have not gone unnoticed, particularly in the context of the global “Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions” (BDS) movement, which targets companies associated with Israeli settlements and military actions. However, the extent of these boycotts varies by region.

While the claim that Bata faced boycotts in Malaysia is unsubstantiated, the company did experience direct consumer boycotts in Bangladesh. These actions, driven by solidarity with the Palestinian cause, are believed to have contributed to a noticeable decline in Bata’s sales during the same period.

In particular, Bata’s quarterly income statement for 30 September 2023, showed a significant decrease in sales growth, down by 41.69%. This decline coincided with a surge in social media activity promoting the boycott of companies with ties to Israel, although Bata was not explicitly named in the BDS lists. The link between the boycott movement and Bata’s sales plunge remains circumstantial, but the timing suggests a possible connection.

Faqcheck’s review of the data confirms that Bata’s historical operations in Israel and Palestine are well-documented, with a continuing presence in Nablus, West Bank. However, the evidence of ongoing operations in Israel is lacking. The impact of the boycott on Bata’s sales, particularly in Bangladesh, supports the claim that consumer activism has influenced the company’s financial performance, though the precise effect remains difficult to quantify.

Bata’s complex history in the region reflects broader geopolitical tensions, highlighting how global brands can become entangled in international conflicts. In moments like these it is important to proactively employ strategies to safeguard brands against possible disinformation threats. 

Faqcheck provides a comprehesive and bespoke suite of solutions to help safeguard your brand's reputation against disinformation. Let's talk about how we can safeguard your brand—reach out to us on LinkedIn, Instagram or email liyana@faqcheck.org to start the conversation.